Skip to content
gentic.news — AI News Intelligence Platform
Connecting to the Living Graph…

Listen to today's AI briefing

Daily podcast — 5 min, AI-narrated summary of top stories

Jensen Huang in a suit speaks at a podium with Nvidia logo behind him, referencing DeepSeek and Kimi open models…

Jensen Huang: DeepSeek, Kimi open models boost Nvidia sales

Jensen Huang says Chinese open models DeepSeek and Kimi boost Nvidia GPU demand, not threaten it. Market misunderstood their impact twice.

·4d ago·4 min read··59 views·AI-Generated·Report error
Share:
What did Jensen Huang say about Chinese open models like DeepSeek and Kimi?

Jensen Huang said Chinese open models like DeepSeek and Kimi drive AI usage, which increases demand for Nvidia's GPUs and data center infrastructure, benefiting the entire industry.

TL;DR

Huang says open models drive GPU demand · Market misunderstood DeepSeek and Kimi impact · More AI usage means more Nvidia computers

Jensen Huang told Axios that Chinese open models DeepSeek and Kimi are not adversarial to U.S. closed models. Instead, they expand AI usage, which boosts demand for Nvidia's GPUs and data centers.

Key facts

  • Huang: DeepSeek and Kimi are 'excellent' models
  • Nvidia data center revenue hit $30.8B in Q4 2025
  • DeepSeek R1 training cost $5.6M reported
  • Kimi uses 1M-token context window
  • January 2025 sell-off wiped $589B from Nvidia

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang pushed back against the narrative that Chinese open-source AI models threaten U.S. companies, arguing in a new Axios interview that they actually expand the market for Nvidia's hardware. According to @rohanpaul_ai, Huang said: "These Chinese models are excellent. The market misunderstood the impact of DeepSeek the first time, and it has misunderstood the impact of another Chinese model, Kimi, again this time."

Huang framed open models as demand drivers rather than competitors. "Great open AI models are good for the whole industry," he said. "Whenever there is more usage, Nvidia will sell many more computers. We will have to build more data centres, offer more services, and the technology will spread into more industries." This is consistent with Nvidia's Q4 2025 earnings call, where the company reported data center revenue of $30.8 billion, up 93% year-over-year, driven by AI inference workloads.

Huang also rejected the binary framing that open models are "adversarial" to closed models from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic. "That is also incorrect," he said. "The person most likely to upgrade to a great model from a company such as Anthropic or OpenAI is someone who already uses AI." This suggests open models serve as an on-ramp, converting non-users into AI consumers who may eventually pay for premium closed models.

The timing is notable: DeepSeek's R1 model, released in January 2025, triggered a $589 billion single-day sell-off in Nvidia shares on January 27, 2025, as investors feared cheaper open models would reduce GPU demand. Huang now argues the opposite — that cheaper inference drives more total compute consumption, a pattern observed in the 2023-2025 GPU shortage where inference workloads grew from 30% to 70% of Nvidia's data center revenue.

Key Takeaways

  • Jensen Huang says Chinese open models DeepSeek and Kimi boost Nvidia GPU demand, not threaten it.
  • Market misunderstood their impact twice.

The structural logic

Huang's argument rests on a Jevons paradox for AI compute: as the marginal cost of inference falls, total compute demand rises. DeepSeek's reported training cost of $5.6 million (per its technical report) and its 671B-parameter MoE architecture with 37B activated parameters per token made inference dramatically cheaper than GPT-4-class models. Kimi, developed by Moonshot AI, uses a 1M-token context window and has been adopted heavily in Chinese enterprise search. Both models run on Nvidia H100 and B200 GPUs at inference time.

Nvidia's own data supports this: the company's data center revenue grew from $18.4 billion in Q4 2024 to $30.8 billion in Q4 2025, even as open models proliferated. Huang's interview is essentially a public counter-narrative to the "cheap AI kills GPU demand" thesis that briefly wiped $589 billion from Nvidia's market cap in January 2025.

The counterargument

Critics might note that Huang has a direct financial incentive to talk up demand — Nvidia's market cap has recovered to $2.8 trillion as of March 2026. But the structural argument holds: if open models reduce inference costs by 10x, the number of inference queries could grow 100x, requiring more GPUs. The key question is whether the elasticity of demand for AI inference is greater than 1.0 — and Huang is betting it is.

What to watch

Watch Nvidia's Q1 2026 earnings (expected May 2026) for data center revenue growth rate and inference workload share. If inference surpasses 75% of data center revenue, Huang's Jevons paradox thesis is validated.

Sources cited in this article

  1. DeepSeek's
Source: gentic.news · · author= · citation.json

AI-assisted reporting. Generated by gentic.news from 1 verified source, fact-checked against the Living Graph of 4,300+ entities. Edited by Ala SMITH.

Following this story?

Get a weekly digest with AI predictions, trends, and analysis — free.

AI Analysis

Huang's interview is a masterclass in framing a competitive threat as a tailwind. The Jevons paradox logic is defensible — cheaper inference historically drives more total compute — but it's also self-serving. Nvidia's data center revenue grew 93% YoY in Q4 2025 even as open models proliferated, which supports his thesis. However, the key variable is inference elasticity: if demand is price-inelastic (users don't do more just because it's cheaper), then cheaper models reduce GPU demand. Huang is betting on elastic demand. The comparison to the January 2025 sell-off is instructive. The market panicked at DeepSeek's efficiency, treating it as a demand destroyer. Huang is now arguing the opposite — that efficiency gains expand the total addressable market. This mirrors the pattern with AWS's 2014 price cuts, which actually accelerated cloud revenue growth. The difference: cloud compute is a general-purpose resource; AI inference is still narrow. If open models enable new use cases (e.g., real-time video inference, agentic workflows), demand elasticity could be very high. The "open models as on-ramp" claim is harder to prove. There's no public data showing that open model users convert to paid closed model users. Anthropic and OpenAI don't disclose their user acquisition funnels. This is the weakest link in Huang's argument — it's plausible but unsubstantiated.
This story is part of
The AI Infrastructure War Shifts from Chips to Developer Tools
Nvidia's enterprise pivot and AWS's OpenAI bet collide with Cursor's quiet ascent
Compare side-by-side
Nvidia vs DeepSeek
Enjoyed this article?
Share:

AI Toolslive

Five one-click lenses on this article. Cached for 24h.

Pick a tool above to generate an instant lens on this article.

Related Articles

From the lab

The framework underneath this story

Every article on this site sits on top of one engine and one framework — both built by the lab.

More in Opinion & Analysis

View all