Over 200 economists and AI researchers, including 16 Nobel laureates, signed a coordinated statement warning that AI-driven economic transformation could surpass the Industrial Revolution. The 'We Must Act Now' statement, coordinated by the Stanford Digital Economy Lab, proposes no concrete policy measures or timelines.
Key facts
- 200+ economists and AI researchers signed the statement
- 16 Nobel laureates among signatories
- Statement coordinated by Stanford Digital Economy Lab
- No concrete policy measures proposed
- Signatories include Google, OpenAI, Anthropic representatives
More than 200 economists and AI researchers, including 16 Nobel laureates and representatives from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic, are calling for immediate action in a coordinated statement According to The Decoder. The statement is titled "We Must Act Now" and was coordinated by the Stanford Digital Economy Lab.
The core argument boils down to three claims: AI could become "radically more powerful" over the next decade, triggering a transformation "larger than the Industrial Revolution, but unfolding over a vastly shorter time frame." Economists, policymakers, and technology leaders need to act now to create incentives, guardrails, and institutions.
The list of signatories includes Nobel laureates in economics such as Daron Acemoglu, Joseph Stiglitz, Paul Krugman, and Ben Bernanke, alongside representatives of major AI companies. Jeff Dean of Google, Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark, OpenAI's Noam Brown and Sarah Friar, and Wojciech Zaremba of the OpenAI Foundation all signed on.
The revolution stays hypothetical for now
"AI capabilities are advancing far faster than our understanding of the economic implications. In that gap lie the greatest opportunities of our era," Brynjolfsson wrote, according to the Stanford Digital Economy Lab's press release. He said action is needed now so that AI "creates prosperity for the many, not just the few."
The statement explicitly warns of "large-scale job displacement" as one of the risks, but also sees "major gains in living standards" as a potential upside. Throughout, it stays in conditional language. AI "may" become radically more capable. It "could" trigger an unprecedented transformation, and it "could" cost jobs. The paper doesn't name specific policy measures or timelines.
Nobel laureate Michael Spence of New York University called for an "all hands on deck" approach given the uncertainty about the scale and timing of the effects. Tom Cunningham of the research organization METR put it more bluntly: "We are driving in fog, and it is extraordinarily difficult to anticipate what will happen next."
Some AI CEOs are walking back their own warnings
The authors could hardly have picked a better moment to publish. Just over the weekend, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said he was "pretty sure" that AI has been a net job creator so far. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei also recently described automation more as a productivity multiplier than a job killer. A basic problem is that no established methods exist yet to measure potential productivity gains from AI.
Deepmind CEO Demis Hassabis didn't comment explicitly on job losses but said in April the arrival of artificial general intelligence (AGI) would be equivalent to "10 times the industrial revolution at 10 times the speed." A system like that could emerge within the next five years. Hassabis, who is also a Nobel laureate, is not one of the signatories.
Studies showing a significant AI-driven effects on the labor market have so far found none.
What to watch
Watch for any follow-up working groups or policy proposals from signatories, particularly the Stanford Digital Economy Lab's next research output. The gap between this statement and Altman/Amodei's recent downplaying of job displacement will test whether AI CEOs follow through on their signatures.
Source: the-decoder.com
